The FDA Tried to Hide Covid Vaccine Data From The Public

The FDA Tried to Hide Covid Vaccine Data From The Public

This Law Suit Forced the Release of That Data

That Data shows 1,540 Different Side Effects

1,283 associate deaths from the clinical trials -51,335 General Disorders

25,957 Nervous System Disorders -17,283 Musculoskeletal Disorders

14,096 Gastrointestinal Disorders – 8,476 Skin and Tissue Disorders

8,848 Repertory Disorders – 4,610 Infections – 1,403 Cardiovascular Disorders

First See The Court Case Below

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH DIVISION

PUBLIC HEALTH AND MEDICAL
PROFESSIONALS FOR  TRANSPARENCY ,
Plaintiff,

V.

No. 4:21-cv-1058-P

FOOD AND D RUG ADMINISTRATION,
Defendant

“In response to a Freedom of Information Act request, the Food and Drug Administration asked a federal judge for permission to make the public wait until the year 2096 to disclose all of the data it relied upon to license Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine.

That is not a typo. The FDA wanted court approval to have up to 75 years to publicly disclose this information.”

“U.S. District Judge Mark T. Pittman, Northern District of Texas, expressed dismay at the FDA’s proposed rate of production. He found the duration requested by the FDA unreasonable, comparing it to the actions of totalitarian nations. As such, the judge on Jan. 6 ordered the FDA to produce at least 55,000 pages per month.

In his ruling, the judge recognized that the release of this data is of paramount public importance and should be one of the FDA’s highest priorities. He quoted James Madison as saying a “popular Government, without popular information, or the means of acquiring it, is but a Prologue to a Farce or a Tragedy” and John F. Kennedy as explaining that a “nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people.” “

source : https://news.bloomberglaw.com/health-law-and-business/why-a-judge-ordered-fda-to-release-covid-19-vaccine-data-pronto

“A group of scientists and medical researchers sued the FDA under FOIA to force release of hundreds of thousands of documents related to licensing of the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine. Plaintiff’s attorney Aaron Siri, who is representing the group, explains the fight that led a federal court to order expedited release of documents the agency claimed it would take decades to process.”  Ibid

Court order date ORDERED on this 6th day of January, 2022.

Court order source: https://www.sirillp.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/ORDER_2022_01_06-9e24e298ae561d16d68a3950ab57077b.pdf

The Judge Direct Ruling Said

““Open government is fundamentally an American issue”—it is
neither a Republican nor a Democrat issue.2 As James Madison wrote,
“[a] popular Government, without popular information, or the means of
acquiring it, is but a Prologue to a Farce or a Tragedy; or, perhaps, both.
Knowledge will forever govern ignorance: And a people who mean to be
their own Governors, must arm themselves with the power which 2
knowledge gives.”3  John F. Kennedy likewise recognized that “a nation
that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open
market is a nation that is afraid of its people.”4 And, particularly
appropriate in this case, John McCain (correctly) noted that “[e]xcessive
administrative secrecy . . . feeds conspiracy theories and reduces the
public’s confidence in the government.”5

Echoing these sentiments, “[t]he basic purpose of FOIA is to ensure
an informed citizenry, [which is] vital to the functioning of a democratic
society.” NLRB v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214, 242 (1977).
“FOIA was [therefore] enacted to ‘pierce the veil of administrative
secrecy and to open agency action to the light of public scrutiny.’” Batton
v. Evers, 598 F.3d 169, 175 (5th Cir. 2010) (quoting Dep’t of the Air Force
v. Rose, 425 U.S. 352, 361 (1976)). And “Congress has long recognized
that ‘information is often useful only if it is timely’ and that, therefore
‘excessive delay by the agency in its response is often tantamount to
denial.’” Open Soc’y Just. Initiative v. CIA, 399 F. Supp. 3d 161, 165
(S.D.N.Y. 2019) (quoting H.R. REP . N O. 93-876, at 6271 (1974)). When
needed, a court “may use its equitable powers to require an agency to
process documents according to a court-imposed timeline.” Clemente v.
FBI, 71 F. Supp. 3d 262, 269 (D.D.C. 2014).”

SO ORDERED on this 6th day of January, 2022.
Mark T. Pittman
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Part Two

The Following Document Was Part of Those Records Produced

BNT162b2
5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorization Adverse Event Reports
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 1
5.3.6 CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS OF POST-AUTHORIZATION ADVERSE EVENT
REPORTS OF PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) RECEIVED THROUGH 28-FEB-2021

An Adverse Event is a Side Effect. The PDF file of this document can be found here

https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf?fbclid=IwAR2zwgJCMzow5PaRiZ5a_zxxoES9UKTLh1-VUVMLw9siqDL9NNnZNGJ2lJk

In this document you will see Pfizer reported there were 1,540 different side effects

1,283 associate deaths from the clinical trials -51,335 General Disorders

25,957 Nervous System Disorders -17,283 Musculoskeletal Disorders

14,096 Gastrointestestinal Disorders – 8,476 Skin and Tissue Disorders

8,848 Repertory Disorders – 4,610 Infections

1,403 Cardiovascular Disorders

Below is New Data Just Released April 2022

Through 28 February 2021 (data lock point aligned with Pharmacovigilance Plan),
there were a total of 42,086 case reports (25,379 medically confirmed and 16,707 non-medically
confirmed) containing 158,893 events. Cases were received from 63 countries.
Consistent with what was seen in Phase 2/3 of Study C4591001, most reported AEs were in
System Organ Classes (SOCs) with reactogenicity events: general disorders and administration
site conditions (51,335), nervous system disorders (25,957), musculoskeletal and connective
tissue disorders (17,283), and gastrointestinal disorders (14,096). Post-authorization data have
also informed the addition of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) related to the experience of
reactogenicity to the product labeling.

source: p.14

https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/125742_S1_M1_priority-review-request-1.pdf

Part Three

Were You Told of The Risks ?

Were you told of Alternatives to the Product?

Under Emergency Authorization Use the FDA must Disclose Side Effects to the User ( Pubic )to ensure that individuals to whom the product is administered are informed—

Under Title 21 Food and Drugs of the US Code

  • 360bbb–3. Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies. (e) Conditions of authorization
(1) Unapproved product,(A) Required conditions, (III) of the alternatives to the product
that are available, and of their benefits and risks.
(ii) Appropriate conditions designed to ensure that individuals to whom the product is administered are informed—

Source: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2011-title21/pdf/USCODE-2011-title21-chap9-subchapV-partE-sec360bbb-3.pdf?fbclid=IwAR0ge4Cj6J7fwLU6L3kqawbLVgaeBJ1MdwjiEPKXyDkVyIRTYZ4rf-ZB94M

Part Four

Pfizer said last month that it expected $32 billion in revenue from its vaccine this year. “The COVID-19 vaccine could eventually become a yearly shot like the flu vaccine – at least, that is the hope of Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla”  https://tellall.org/jkkwsp/pfizer-lawsuit-2022-covid-vaccine.html

Epilogue

Watch Pfizer Whistleblower Tell What She Witnessed

https://youtu.be/RaLxhFiOBYk

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.